Graduate Council Meeting
Minutes
Coastal
September 3,
2008
Members Present:
Mark Mitchell (Business Administration-sitting in for Dr. John Marcis
and Dr. Dennis Rauch), Emory Helms, (Education), Joe Winslow (Education), Jill
Sessoms (Humanities and Fine Arts), Miglena Ivanova (Humanities and Fine Arts),
Susan Libes (Natural and Applied Sciences), John Reilly (Natural and Applied
Sciences), Dan Lawless (Registrar), and Richard Johnson (Associate Provost for
Graduate Studies and Academic Outreach).
Guests: Judy Engelhard (Associate Dean,
The meeting was called to order by Dr. Richard
Johnson at 11:30 a.m. in the Conference Room of the
Old
Business:
New Business:
1. Dr. Richard Johnson provided all attendees copies of initiatives
for the next year or so with regards to Graduate Studies which he has submitted
to the Provost. He will be meeting with
the Graduate Directors on a monthly basis to assist in looking at aspects of
graduate programs. All proposals will
come back to the Graduate Council for approval.
Several issues he will be
bringing forward in the Graduate Directors meeting is;
(a) Try to find uniformity
between the programs such as admissions processes.
(b) To find some common
grounds with regards of Graduate Assistantships in prioritizing and awarding
assistantships. They will be prioritized
in the following manner: Teaching
assistants, research assistants, and clerical assistants. Specific duties and criteria should be
outlined in detail with each assistantship request. Also need to clarify how
the assistantships are awarded with monies awarded meeting minimum wages,
number of hours work, etc.
(c) Graduate admissions processing is done in the
Graduate Studies Office. Need to
determine where publications/public relations materials are paid from. Either
Graduate Studies or the Departments will have to build this money in their
respective budgets.
(a) To come up with a set of policies and
procedures for curriculum submission and guidelines,
(b) The current council by-laws need to be
reviewed and any necessary changes made.
Dr. Richard Johnson will make copies of the current by-laws and sent to
each member for review,
(c) The
Provost has requested that the Council begin defining graduate faculty. Dr. Johnson provided some models from
(a) One subcommittee to
review the by-laws of CCU to look at areas to where revisions are needed or
putting in items with regards to definitions of faculty if need be and what
models to propose and put some type of draft together for the Provost by the
end of this semester.
(b) One subcommittee to put together procedural
curriculum guidelines so that the departments will have a complete picture of
what is expected when items come to the Committee.
Dr. Johnson requested that
members think about this request and email him as to if they would like to
serve and on which committee they would like to serve.
Dr. Susan Libes raised the
question that this had been put forward before and met with concern from the
Senate on the Graduate Council taking on any more formality and authority. To
the best of her recollection, at that time the Council would stand back and
when the University grew large enough, this would be put forward again. Is the University at that point now? It was recommended that this be discussed
with the Senate.
Dr. Johnson responded that
he feels the University Provost is supportive of this move. Most of the Deans did not realize that the Graduate
Council does not report to the Faculty Senate.
We only report to them what the Graduate Committee has approved. He wants to make sure that whatever the Council
decides to do meets with Faculty Senate approval. He would also like to sit
down with the Chair of the Senate to go over some of the initiatives before
going too much further but the Committee should begin looking at some models in
regards to the initiatives.
Dr. Susan Libes also asked
“Is it standard operating procedures for all Directors of the Graduate Colleges
to be present at the Graduate Council
meetings”? Dr. Johnson responded that he
would like them to be. It has been his
past experience that they have been included. He asked for any thoughts. Dr. Libes suggested that each college
graduate program director be the communication conduit between the Graduate
Council and their respective college to make sure that their college faculty
gets the information they need about what is going on in the Graduate
Council. After much discussion, this
proposal was not voted on.
Announcements
1.
Dr. Johnson announced to the Council that the Board of Trustees has put
a charge to the Provost who in turn has put the charge to Dr. Barbara Burd, Executive Director of the Library & Instructional
Technology,
that they would like an on-line program at CCU in three years. Dr. Burd will be meeting with the Program
Directors on September 17th to bring this back to their respective
colleges for possible programs or parts of programs. Rational is what demographics are we
meeting. More information will be
brought to the Graduate Council in future meetings along with the possibility
of Dr. Barbara Burd addressing the Council.
Meeting
was adjourned at 12:40 p.m. Next Graduate Council meeting is 10/01/08.