Annual Undergraduate Research Competition
The annual CCU Undergraduate Research Competition is held in April of each year. The Competition celebrates the accomplishments of CCU undergraduate researchers and provides a venue for the dissemination of student research. Undergraduate research includes original research and scholarly or creative works, so all disciplines are represented. All CCU undergraduate researchers are eligible and encouraged to submit abstracts to present research that they completed during the previous year. Presentations are judged within broad disciplinary categories and the top presentations for each category win cash awards.
2021 Annual CCU Undergraduate Research Competition
(The URC is going VIRTUAL!)
View Schedule and Links to Presentations Sessions via Kimbel Library's Digital Commons
Or, view the entire program and abstracts (including session links) on a pdf document:
Wednesday, April 21, 2021
12:00 – 2:00 PM Poster Session I
2:30 – 6:00 PM Oral Presentations
Thursday, April 21, 2021
12:00 – 4:00 PM Oral Presentations
4:30 - 6:30 PM Poster Session II
Instructions for Presenters
Presentation Authorship: For the purposes of the Undergraduate Research Competition abstract, the listed presenter should be an undergraduate student who is the primary author of the presentation and the primary investigator/creator for the work being presented. The student is welcome to list the faculty research mentor and any number of individuals as co-authors on the presentation title slide or poster heading, but for the competition abstract, only the lead presenter should be listed. In cases where two or more students have contributed equally to a project and wish to co-present together, more than one name can be listed on the abstract as presenters. Please be aware that if a group presentation wins an award, there is only one award for the entire group.
Oral Presentations: Presentation length should be about 12 minutes long and cannot go over 13 minutes. Since this year you are pre-recording your presentations, we will strictly enforce this time limit and will not accept submissions that exceed the time limit. Preferred video format is mp4. If you have format questions, please contact Rob Young (email@example.com).
Poster Presentations: In the past, posters have been limited to 3 feet by 4 feet (landscape or portrait). This year, you will be presenting a virtual file of your poster, so the actual size is less important than what you fit on a single screen, or how you zoom in and out of the various sections. Note that font sizes that may have worked in person for 3’ x 4’ poster maybe too small for single static image. You may need to think carefully about how much text you use as compared to images, or you may need to plan for a mechanism to visually maneuver through your poster and zoom in and out of various sections as you make your presentation. You may create your poster on any number of platforms, but the uploaded version should be a pdf copy.
Judging of Presentations
Each presentation will be judged by at least two faculty judges. The judges are all volunteers with scheduling issues of their own, so it is logistically impossible to have the same judges for all presentations or to always match up the disciplines of judges and student presenters. A system is in place to identify outliers (judges who consistently score too high or too low) and adjust the scores accordingly for the final awards. You should expect to have one judge from your discipline or a related discipline and one judge who is not from your discipline (often not even your college). Audience members are likely to be from diverse backgrounds, as well. Therefore, you should plan your presentation to reach a broadly intelligent general audience, but not necessarily specialists in your field. In your presentation, do not shy away from the specific terminology and potentially complex concepts of your field, but recognize that you may need to provide some background or additional explanation as needed. You should review the presentation scoring rubrics above when preparing your presentation. The judges will score each category, so be sure you have addressed all of them. The judges know that different disciplines place varying levels of significance on different rubric categories, and they are instructed to adjust their expectations according to discipline. For example, the Methodology/Strategy portion of an English senior thesis presentation might be very short compared to the same section for a psychology presentation with extensive experimental designs and protocols, and that is appropriate. One of the categories for oral presentations is "Answers to Questions." The judges have been instructed to ask questions if no one else does; however, if your presentation goes long and does not leave time for questions, you will not get points in that category.
Office for Undergraduate Research
Baxley Hall 223
Interim Dean, College of Graduate Studies and Research
Undergraduate Research Assistant